|
Post by GhostFist on Jul 17, 2013 15:53:03 GMT -5
So I've come across a number of custom built tables, but this one really stands out. I've yet to build one myself but you can purchase plans through his website. Well thought out indeed and the plans are very detailed. and his website is here.... link
|
|
|
Post by wrightwoodwork on Jul 20, 2013 17:49:42 GMT -5
Pretty neat idea that can be adapted to your needs
|
|
|
Post by jalvis on Jul 20, 2013 23:04:27 GMT -5
I wish there was time for me to build one. Sure looks like a good design.
|
|
|
Post by 7 on Sept 3, 2013 22:46:22 GMT -5
Doesn't look like much after the portable table video but this is my basic work table. I like that the top can be switched out with no screws etc. So far I only have two tops- one for cutting with a track saw with a sacrificial top and another with a router table built in. I will make more tops as my ideas are always evolving but here it is so far.
|
|
|
Post by 7 on Sept 3, 2013 22:51:39 GMT -5
Here is a quick shot of my miter saw table. It looks like it would be unstable but it is actually quite stable. It just attaches onto the standard Dewalt stand. The table supports 16' lengths of baseboard really well because it extends out 9' from the blade. Also here is one more picture of the work table. Attachments:
|
|
|
Post by GhostFist on Sept 4, 2013 0:53:46 GMT -5
Nice work, similar in concept to Ron paulk's bench. Ill post some video of his latest in the morning.
|
|
|
Post by 7 on Sept 7, 2013 0:32:43 GMT -5
Yes it is similar to his table. Im impressed that he made the legs, different fences and everything. I prefer a bit smaller size than 4x8 and wanted to cut right into the top like the mft. I noticed in one of Jalvis' cutting videos that he mentioned he made the paulk table.
|
|
|
Post by jalvis on Sept 8, 2013 21:46:24 GMT -5
I built Ron's bench per the plans after they were released for purchase. Been using it for nearly three years and its a great bench. One thing to note is my bench is the older design. Check out this ink to my instagram: www.instagram.com/p/dScFvkunwk/One recommendation is to make it at 3.5'x7' rather than Ron's 4'x8.' Makes more sense.
|
|
|
Post by 7 on Sept 8, 2013 22:30:40 GMT -5
The MDF insert top on mine is exactly 36"x76". I can't see a reason to go any bigger. It fits in the back of my standard bed truck between the wheel wells and tailgate closed if I am not taking the full trailer. The biggest sheets I work with are the standard 4'x8" so even if I am only ripping an inch off the edge it is still really stable. I also like the idea of only one surface rather than two for ease of set up and no alignment issues, though I am sure Ron has accommodation for the alignment.
One thing I cannot say however...I don't know that I would feel comfortable putting over a thousand pounds of lumber on my table and still have the confidence to leave my MT55 sitting under it. That is a cool picture on your instagram link. I am actually surprise those ply horses are that stable & strong.
|
|
sgtrjp
Junior Member
Posts: 65
|
Post by sgtrjp on Sept 8, 2013 23:16:59 GMT -5
I had the same idea about keeping my top under 6.5 feet to fit in a short-bed. Being a single piece, is the size/weight still manageable? I figure it's not much heavier than a single piece of the full size 2-part table.
|
|
|
Post by jalvis on Sept 9, 2013 9:51:37 GMT -5
The Two part system works well for me and I actually like being able to take them apart for two separate tables if need be. As for alignment there is a bolt system one uses to pull the two parts together and the saw horses keep them equal in height. The real value in the Paulk design are the clamping holes and below table storage.
All my tables including the miter saw stand get used and I mean really used. I'm not afraid of cutting, marring, staining, or getting glue on the surfaces. Its amazing to me when I see shops with perfectly clean tools and work tables. Makes me wonder if anything is getting built.
|
|
|
Post by jalvis on Sept 9, 2013 9:55:14 GMT -5
7 - So whats with that funky star cut-out on the underside of your table? Its visible in the photo with the top removed.
|
|
|
Post by 7 on Sept 9, 2013 22:59:16 GMT -5
I had the same idea about keeping my top under 6.5 feet to fit in a short-bed. Being a single piece, is the size/weight still manageable? I figure it's not much heavier than a single piece of the full size 2-part table. It is very manageable. I would guess the top is about the same weight as the rest of the table. The top just lifts off, no screws, just gravity. Then the skeleton just lifts off the sawhorse legs again just gravity and friction. I rarely ever fold the horses up because they tend to fit for transportation without needing to break them down. If weight were a concern then ply would for sure be lighter than MDF. I like how clean MDF drills and that it is really flat. I can weigh it if your interested in exact weight but bottom line it is easy to move and quick to set up.
|
|
|
Post by 7 on Sept 9, 2013 23:13:34 GMT -5
The Two part system works well for me and I actually like being able to take them apart for two separate tables if need be. As for alignment there is a bolt system one uses to pull the two parts together and the saw horses keep them equal in height. The real value in the Paulk design are the clamping holes and below table storage. All my tables including the miter saw stand get used and I mean really used. I'm not afraid of cutting, marring, staining, or getting glue on the surfaces. Its amazing to me when I see shops with perfectly clean tools and work tables. Makes me wonder if anything is getting built. I see your point on the two parts. I realized right after I posted that the horses would level the two sides and it wouldn't be an issue but just hoped nobody would catch that part . I agree with you on using the tables, and tools for that matter. I am usually quite happy to replace something if I completely wear it out and by that point the item has definitely added to profitability enough to easily justify the cost and then some. I only feel slightly guilty every once in a while...like cutting out a square in sheetrock with the KSS300 to install a door. I justified that use as the least dusty way to cut out sheetrock in a room with a bunch of cubicles with computers. Seems you can relate. Gotta get the jobs done efficiently to keep the cool tools rolling in.
|
|
|
Post by 7 on Sept 9, 2013 23:24:31 GMT -5
7 - So whats with that funky star cut-out on the underside of your table? Its visible in the photo with the top removed. The star cut out is where the router drops through when used with that top. I drilled the hole pattern in the bottom of the table before cutting out the router and it just ended up looking odd like that. The holes in the bottom are to cut the weight down and let dust fall through a little bit.
|
|